NPR's All Things Considered aired a commentary yesterday by a sixth grade teacher named Daneil Ferri, objecting to the use of the expression "did good" by his students and by sportscasters, most particularly (allegedly) Bob Costas. Although it was a funny piece, Ferri missed an important point, prompting me to write the following email to NPR:
<<At the risk of being a goody-goody or a goody-two shoes, I must take
issue with Daniel Ferri's commentary aired April 6th,about the expression "did
good." His otherwise amusing story overlooked the possibility that erudite
sportscaster Bob Costas may have spoken correctly.
"Good is an
adjective," Ferri insisted to his class, and to his listeners. It is,
sometimes, but what if it isn't? Sometimes "good" is a noun meaning the quality
(or quantity!) of goodness, as in, "the battle of Good and Evil," or "In the
battle for correct grammar, James Thurber was a force for good," or even, "Bob
Brenly's batting order du jour may do some good." Costas may have said
something of the sort, and said it correctly. By the same token, people who try
to save the world are correctly called "do-gooders," not "do-betters." Myself,
I'd like to do some good, and do it well.
Regards,
Karen Funk
Blocher>>
2 comments:
<<or even, "Bob Brenly's batting order du jour may do some good.">>
Maybe, but the pitching order (rotation) is pure evil.
I haven't watched one minute of a Diamondbacks game so far this year. Even if I didn't feel as if they're no longer the team I knew, I just haven't time! - Thanks for posting! - Karen
Post a Comment